Research on GPCR-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Models Based on GA-SVR and RF

Authors

  • Zhaopeng Dong
  • Yihan Hu
  • Qinghua Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/95533w56

Keywords:

G protein-coupled receptors; Ligand binding affinity; Support Vector Regression; Genetic Algorithm; Random Forest.

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a class of cell surface receptors regulating signal transduction and represent important drug targets. Traditional experimental methods face bottlenecks such as being time-consuming and costly. This study aims to construct high-precision prediction models for GPCR-ligand binding affinity. Utilizing support vector machines optimized by a genetic algorithm and random forest models, based on 933 sets of GPCR-ligand binding data, molecular fingerprints and protein sequence features were extracted. After normalization, the data was partitioned into training, test, and validation sets in an 8:1:1 ratio. Model performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Experimental results demonstrated that GA-SVR outperformed RF in terms of RMSE and MAE metrics, while RF performed better in R². GA-SVR achieved RMSE, R², MAE values of 0.3388±0.0115, 0.8378±0.0126, and 0.2137±0.0054, respectively. RF achieved RMSE, R2, MAE values of 0.4360±0.0192, 0.9478±0.0042, and 0.3172±0.0110, respectively. GA-SVR showed greate r stability in error control, making it suitable for fine-grained prediction, while RF, due to its powerful nonlinear fitting capability, performed better in capturing overall trends. This study effectively overcomes the efficiency limitations of traditional experimental methods in drug screening, significantly enhances lead compound screening efficacy, and provides innovative solutions for advancing drug discovery and desig.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Li L, An Z H, Lin C, et al. An update on regulation and function of G protein-coupled receptors in cancer: A promising strategy for cancer therapy [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta-Rev Cancer, 2025, 1880 (2): 12.

[2] Liu S, Anderson P J, Rajagopal S, et al. G Protein-Coupled Receptors: A Century of Research and Discovery [J]. CircRes, 2024, 135 (1): 174 - 197.

[3] Cjen W, Song C, Leng L, et al. The Application of Artificial Intelligence Accelerates G Protein-Coupled Receptor Ligand Discovery [J]. Engineering, 2024, 32: 18 - 28.

[4] Niazi S K, Mariam Z. Computer-Aided Drug Design and Drug Discovery: A Prospective Analysis [J]. Pharmaceuticals, 2024, 17 (1): 22.

[5] Wu Z H, Chen S P, Wang Y H, et al. Current perspectives and trend of computer-aided drug design: a review and bibliometric analysis [J]. Int J Surg, 2024, 110 (6): 3848 - 3878.

[6] Szwabowski G L, Baker D L, Parrill A L. Application of computational methods for class A GPCR Ligand discovery [J]. J Mol Graph, 2023, 121: 16.

[7] Lin H. An Alternative Mode of GPCR Transactivation: Activation of GPCRs by Adhesion GPCRs [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2025, 26 (2): 18.

[8] Zhou W, Yan Z X, Zhang L T. A comparative study of 11 non-linear regression models highlighting autoencoder, DBN, and SVR, enhanced by SHAP importance analysis in soybean branching prediction [J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14 (1): 16.

[9] Cai W L, Fang C, Liu L F, et al. Pseudo targeted metabolomics-based random forest model for tracking plant species from herbal products [J]. Phytomedicine, 2023, 118: 154927.

[10] Wu X T, Pan J H, Zhu X W. Optimizing the ecological source area identification method and building ecological corridor using a genetic algorithm: A case study in Weihe River Basin, NW China [J]. Ecol Inform, 2024, 80: 12.

Downloads

Published

16-03-2026

How to Cite

Dong, Z., Hu, Y., & Li, Q. (2026). Research on GPCR-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Models Based on GA-SVR and RF. Transactions on Environment, Energy and Earth Sciences, 6, 114-123. https://doi.org/10.62051/95533w56